Feature

News

Tech Line

Breaking News

New Products

America's Street Guide

Literature Review

Supplier Directory

Links

Toolbox

Message Board

Archives

The Chief Engineer - HOME

HOME

Contact Us

Subscribe to Magazine

Pay Dues

Join Us

About Us

President's Message November, 2008
 


Wrench

Past Events

Upcoming Events

 
RSS File Feed
RSS File Feed For This Site

For Advertising Information Click Here

Tech Line  

Committed
 
 

Stay informed of the latest news and important bulletins:

Enter email address and press "GO". Check the "unsubscribe" button to unsubscribe.

subscribe
unsubscribe

Archives

We have the initiative, but do we have a plan?

by John J. Fanning

“For every action there is an equal and opposite reaction”.

Isaac Newton

Newton’s 3rd Law of Motion

 

At his state of the union address, President Bush announced an initiative to replace 75% of U.S. oil imports by 2025. To achieve this objective, the President has requested an additional $150 million for the Biofuel Initiative - a 60% increase over 2006 expenditures.

According to the Department of Energy, the Biofuels Initiative will “lead to the use of non-food based biomass, such as agricultural waste, trees, forest residues, and perennial grasses (being used) in the production of transportation fuels, electricity, and other products.”

From a geopolitical standpoint, there is very little to argue about in the President’s initiative. Reducing dependency on Middle East oil is a smart move. After all, it isn’t like we have made any new friends in the neighborhood over the past six years. To Americans, the Middle East is like a gas station in a bad neighborhood. We may need the gas, but we have no intention of lingering about and making small talk with the attendant.

The idea of taking soybeans and corn and turning them into fuels that power our SUV’s just sounds like the right thing to do. Sure, it may cost us more for an ear of corn in the future as demand for fuel puts pressure on the salad bar, but that’s a small price to pay for growing our own and achieving energy independence.

You can obtain about 446 liters of crude oil from one hectare of soybeans, and about 172 liters of crude oil from one hectare of corn. So I suppose corn biofuel will be rated “premium” at the pump in the future. Besides corn and soybeans, there are many other types of organic vegetation that can be converted to biofuel. Palm oil, for example, is extracted from the fruit of palm trees. Palm oil can produce 6,000 liters of crude oil from just one hectare of land. Because of this extraordinary ability, palm oil plantations are being planted throughout Asia. Millions of hectares of former rainforest across Malaysia, Indonesia, and Thailand have been cleared to cultivate palm oil. It has become the world’s number one fruit, surpassing the banana, which doesn’t have the ability to fuel much more than a minor appetite.

This rush to plant palm oil plantations throughout Asia is bringing an end to the orangutans that inhabited the rain forests. Unless we can devise some plan to get debit cards into their hands, orangutans will probably disappear from the Earth. Some Asian countries are trying to form a palm oil cartel, like OPEC, with the intentions of controlling the price of palm oil. But because palm oil can be cultivated in so many places, that could prove to be a non-starter.

Ironically, palm oil originated in the rainforests of West Africa. That being the case, you might think that palm oil plantations would be best suited for cultivation there as opposed to Asia. But despite their origin, Asia now produces twice the amount of palm oil, as does all of Africa. In the future, this will probably change. As stability comes to West African nations, money will be invested in palm oil production and West African nations may stand a chance of finally cashing in at the global marketplace.

Technically, palm oil can be cultivated anywhere within 10ยบ of the Equator so long as there is sufficient rainfall. At present, palm oil sells on the market at about $400 per metric ton, which translates into about $54 per barrel. So if you were wondering why OPEC has dropped their price for crude to around $54 per barrel, keep in mind that palm oil and the research going into the improved cultivation of palm oil as a biofuel is something that OPEC nations don’t particularly want to encourage.

As more palm oil plantations take root throughout the world, the price of palm oil will drop. And as more biofuel plants come on line, the price of crude oil will also drop. This is the basic law of commodities trading. Supply and demand will work to offset the price of crude oil making all fuels cheaper. Crude oil, which for hundreds of years was the only game in town, now has to compete on the marketplace with suitable alternatives. And this makes all of our lives more interesting. In the very near future, Engineers will not only be checking the price of oil in the spot market, they will also be checking the price of various biofuels.

As for biofuel production in the U.S., a lot of people are looking to cash in on the President’s new initiative. But it is important to understand that biofuel production will be subject to the same economics as every other commodity. It remains to be seen if corn and soybean derived biofuel can compete against palm oil and cheap crude. What the President’s initiative really did was wake up America to the fact that there are alternatives to crude oil. And now that everyone sees it, it will be very interesting to see what finally results. For years and years Americans paid lower prices for gasoline than most everyone else in the world. Will American be willing to pay higher prices than everyone else in order to preserve a homegrown biofuel industry?

For years environmentalists have warned of the importance of saving the rainforests. Will the promise of riches derived from palm oil cultivation be the deathblow to these already endangered habitats? Will future generations of Americans ride along with the family in the biofueled SUV’s to Disney World to experience what was an actual rainforest?

And what about the land needed to farm biofuels? From 2000 to 2005, Wisconsin, a state with great arable land, lost 5% of its farmland to development. That’s about 30,000 acres a year lost to concrete and blacktop. How can the U.S. sustain and grow a biofuel industry while at the same time it feeds the world with commodity exports and plows under its farmland to build gated communities?

It just seems to me that besides an initiative, we should also have a plan.

Hmmm, where have I heard that before?




Archives

Please rate this article:

Not Useful Very Useful


 

Feature :: News :: Tech Line :: Breaking News :: New Products :: America's Street Guide :: Literature Review :: Supplier Directory :: Links :: Toolbox :: Archives
 

Contact Webmaster
 

Chief Engineers Association of Chicagoland
4701 Midlothian Turnpike, Suite 4
Crestwood, IL 60445
Phone: 708.293.1720 Fax: 708.293.1432
Copyright © 2008, Chicagoland Chief Engineer All Rights Reserved
www.chiefengineer.org
 

Internet Marketing - Chicago Web Design by PrairieWeb