Feature

News

Tech Line

Breaking News

New Products

America's Street Guide

Literature Review

Supplier Directory

Links

Toolbox

Message Board

Archives

The Chief Engineer - HOME

HOME

Contact Us

Subscribe to Magazine

Pay Dues

Join Us

About Us

President's Message November, 2008
 


Wrench

Past Events

Upcoming Events

 
RSS File Feed
RSS File Feed For This Site

For Advertising Information Click Here

News  

Committed
 
 

Stay informed of the latest news and important bulletins:

Enter email address and press "GO". Check the "unsubscribe" button to unsubscribe.

subscribe
unsubscribe

Archives

Scientists Expected Tsunami From Earthquake

EWA BEACH, HI (AP) - Tsunami experts were “baffled” that the forceful earthquake off Indonesia failed to launch massive waves similar to those generated by the quake three months ago that killed at least 175,000 people in the same region.

A magnitude 8.7 quake shook Indonesia’s west coast, killing hundreds of people and spreading panic across the Indian Ocean that another killer tsunami was on the way.

There was no destructive tsunami generated, but a small wave was detected by a tide gauge on Cocos Island near Australia, about 1,500 miles south of the epicenter, according to the Pacific Tsunami Warning Center on Oahu.

“I’m baffled an earthquake this size didn’t trigger a tsunami near the epicenter,” said Robert Cessaro, a geophysicist at the center, which is operated by the National Oceanic Atmospheric Administration, or NOAA.
Charles McCreery, director of the center charged with monitoring seismic and ocean conditions in the Pacific and alerting Pacific Rim nations and U.S. agencies, said earthquakes of at least 8.0 magnitude usually generate major tsunamis.

“We expected some destructive tsunami with some distant destructive affects. It was surprising,” he said.

The latest event also demonstrated “there’s a whole world of uncertainty about trying to judge a tsunami based on the earthquake data,” he said.

The warning center initially estimated the Dec. 26 earthquake - which killed at least 175,000 people in 12 Indian Ocean nations and left another 106,000 missing - to have a magnitude of 8.0, but it turned out to be much larger - a 9.0.

The preliminary estimate was higher, magnitude 8.5, but had no destructive tsunami.

“The one we initially thought was bigger turns out to have no effect,” McCreery said. “The one we initially thought was smaller had a huge effect. This is the challenge of tsunami warning.”

Some scientists believe the depth of the quake was the reason no tsunami was generated.

The U.S. Geological Survey said the latest quake struck about 19 miles under the seabed. The December quake was closer to the surface.

“What causes a tsunami is if the ocean floor heaves, so if it’s a very shallow tsunami, it’s apt to heave the floor more than a deeper one. If it’s very deep, it sort of gets absorbed on its way up,” said Allen Clark, director of the Pacific Disaster Center on Maui.

The Pacific Tsunami Warning Center, established in 1949, came under heavy criticism following the December tsunami for not being more aggressive about warning Asian nations and possibly saving thousands of lives.

Earlier in March, a group of 58 European tsunami survivors and relatives of victims sued NOAA and other agencies, alleging the center did not do enough to warn people about the disaster.

NOAA officials noted the center has “no official responsibility” for the Indian Ocean and they previously had no communications set up with countries in that area.

“Although we certainly wish that somehow the event unfolded in a way that we could’ve done more for the region, we really did all we could under the circumstances,” McCreery said. “I’m confident there won’t be much to come from this lawsuit.”

Since then, several Indian Ocean nations have established communications with the center and are now on the center’s alert list.

For this latest one, the facility was able to alert those nations with its bulletins electronically, by e-mail, fax, and some were also called as a backup.

“I think we had more success this time being able to get information out quickly to areas in the region, so they can take some action and get people out of harm’s way,” McCreery said.

The Indian Ocean currently has no warning center similar to the one in Hawaii.

“But we have agreed to provide this information in an effort to save lives,” McCreery said. “We issued the information about the strong possibility of tsunamis in the region. We have understood from the phone calls we’ve been making that they did receive the bulletin and were able to act on them.”

Scientists said the biggest difference for the quick response this time around is that there is heightened awareness of tsunamis.

“In the case of the Indian Ocean, we could yell, ‘tsunami,’ but until that event happened, nobody would know what to do.”




Archives

Please rate this article:

Not Useful Very Useful


 

Feature :: News :: Tech Line :: Breaking News :: New Products :: America's Street Guide :: Literature Review :: Supplier Directory :: Links :: Toolbox :: Archives
 

Contact Webmaster
 

Chief Engineers Association of Chicagoland
4701 Midlothian Turnpike, Suite 4
Crestwood, IL 60445
Phone: 708.293.1720 Fax: 708.293.1432
Copyright © 2008, Chicagoland Chief Engineer All Rights Reserved
www.chiefengineer.org
 

Internet Marketing - Chicago Web Design by PrairieWeb