Feature

News

Tech Line

Breaking News

New Products

America's Street Guide

Literature Review

Supplier Directory

Links

Toolbox

Message Board

Archives

The Chief Engineer - HOME

HOME

Contact Us

Subscribe to Magazine

Pay Dues

Join Us

About Us

President's Message February, 2010
 


Wrench

Past Events

Upcoming Events

 
RSS File Feed
RSS File Feed For This Site

For Advertising Information Click Here

News  


 
 

Stay informed of the latest news and important bulletins:

Enter email address and press "GO". Check the "unsubscribe" button to unsubscribe.

subscribe
unsubscribe

Archives

States Call For Stronger Rulings On Mercury Pollution

Calling the Bush Administration’s environmental policies too lax, environmental advocates and other formally asked the state to establish its own rules to reduce mercury emissions from coal-fired plants.

The petition, filed by the Harrisburg-based Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future, asks the state to require that coal-fired power plants reduce mercury emissions by 90 percent by Dec. 15, 2007, instead of the alternatives proposed in December by the Bush administration.

The most ambitious of the administration’s alternatives would reduce mercury emissions from power plants by 70 percent by 2018, said Charles McPhedran, an attorney for Citizens for Pennsylvania’s Future.

“The proposals we’ve seen are too slow and too weak and offer the threat of hot spots,” or areas that have heavier concentrations of mercury, McPhedran said.
The petition was supported by nine other groups, including the Pennsylvania Federation of Sportsmen’s Clubs, Pennsylvania State Building & Construction Trades Council, and several women’s groups. It resembles a recommendation by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency under the Clinton administration.

In 2002, Pennsylvania ranked third, behind Texas and Ohio, for the amount of mercury and mercury compounds released from power plants, according to EPA data.
Kurt Knaus, a spokesman for the state Department of Environmental Protection, said the state prefers a strong federal rule on mercury reduction because it would deal with cross-border pollution and ensure equitable regulation in each state.

Four states - Wisconsin, massachusetts, Connecticut and New Jersey - have moved to regulate mercury outputs by power plants in the past year or so, McPhedran said.

Doug Biden, the president of the Electric Power Generation Association, an industry group, said a 90 percent reduction of mercury is technologically impossible. Rather, a 40 percent reduction is probably possible, he said.

If Pennsylvania enacts a more stringent rule than its neighbors, then “the effect would be to shift generation to the states that aren’t controlling mercury, and most of those states would be upwind of Pennsylvania,” Biden said.




Archives

Please rate this article:

Not Useful Very Useful


 

Feature :: News :: Tech Line :: Breaking News :: New Products :: America's Street Guide :: Literature Review :: Supplier Directory :: Links :: Toolbox :: Archives
 

Contact Webmaster
 

Chief Engineers Association of Chicagoland
4701 Midlothian Turnpike, Suite 4
Crestwood, IL 60445
Phone: 708.293.1720 Fax: 708.293.1432
Copyright © 2010, Chicagoland Chief Engineer All Rights Reserved
www.chiefengineer.org